Film
First, we welcome you to the study of film within the English Department
at Oklahoma State. The film option has been available to students as
a primary or secondary field for more than twenty years. Along the way,
we have had a number of students produce provocative work in the form
of course papers, exam responses, and, finally, publishable theses and
dissertations. At each step of the way, through our courses and (via
personal conferences) our guidance regarding study for the MA Qualifying
Exam, we are eager to help all serious students in any way we can.
The most reliable maps for you as you sketch out your strategy are the
suggested reading list and previous exam questions. The reading list
generally names secondary rather than primary texts, that is, critical
works rather than films; it also includes prominent journals where you
can become conversant with new issues and ideas in film studies. Needless
to say, you should closely view and study key representative films since
the works on the reading list make sense only when complemented by relevant
screenings. If possible, you should acquire a VCR and put it to good
use by renting videos from shops in Stillwater or seeing the tapes available
in the English Department's own collection or in the Microform Media
Room on the library's first floor.
The OSU library has many additional resources that can intensify your
understanding of the topics suggested by works on the reading list. Go
beyond the minimum effort to refine your understanding of film as an
art form and a historical document.
(More information about the MA Qualifying Exam can be found
in the Guidelines.)
Representative Films as Cultural or Historical Documents
Stanley Cavell |
Pursuits of Happiness: The Hollywood
Comedy of Remarriage |
Charles Harpole, ed. |
History of the American Cinema |
Gerald Mast, ed. |
The Movies in Our Midst: Documents
in the Cultural History of Film in America |
Robert Sklar |
Movie‑made America: A Cultural
History of American Movies rev. and updated |
|
issues of Film and History or Screen. |
Representative Films by International Filmmakers
Phillip Kolker |
A Cinema of Loneliness: Penn,
Kubrick, Scorsese, Spielberg, Altman , 2 nd ed. |
Robert Lang |
American Film Melodrama: Griffith,
Vidor, Minnelli |
Tania Modleski |
The Women Who Knew Too Much: Hitchcock
and Feminist Theory |
|
issues of Film Quarterly |
Representative Film Adaptations of Fiction and Drama
(Austen, Dickens, Forster, Lawrence, Mamet, Shakespeare, or Tennessee
Williams)
Jack Jorgens |
Shakespeare on Film |
Brian McFarlane |
Novel to Film: An Introduction
to the Theory of Adaptation |
John Orr and Colin Nicholson eds. |
Cinema and Fiction: New Modes
of Adapting, 1950-1990 |
|
issues of Literature/Film Quarterly |
Representative Theoretical or Critical Approaches
(auteurism, ethnicity studies, feminism, formalism, genre criticism,
historiography, Marxism)
Jim Collins, Hilary Radner and Ava
Preacher Collins, eds. |
Film Theory Goes to the Movies |
Gerald Mast and Marshall Cohen, eds. |
Film Theory and Criticism ,
4th ed. |
Thomas Schatz |
Hollywood Genres |
|
issues of Cinema Journal, Jump
Cut or Wide Angle |
Representative Documentary Filmmakers
(Koppel, Lorentz, Grierson, Ivens, Flaherty, Vertov, or Wiseman)
Erik Barnouw |
Documentary: A History of Non‑Fiction
Film |
Richard Meran Barsam and Jack Ellis |
Nonfiction Film: A Critical History |
Jack Ellis |
The Documenatry Idea |
Bill Nicholsk, ed. |
Representing Reality: Issues and
Concepts in Documentary |
Charles Warren, ed. |
Beyond Document: Essays on Nonfiction
Film |
|
issues of Historical Journal of
Film, Radio, and TV |
Return to Area Reading Lists Page

English Department
College of Arts & Sciences
Oklahoma State University
205 Morrill Hall
Stillwater, OK 74078
Phone: 405-744-9474
For Information about English Programs: english.information@okstate.edu
Webmaster: engweb@okstate.edu
|
 |
 |
Statement of
"Organic Knowledge"
for Literature and
Film
A student with "organic knowledge" of the reading lists will
1. understand the way individual texts reflect the material and intellectual
conditions of the time of their production; this means that the student
can perceive an author's work in reference to history, including literary
or film history, and to contemporary social and philosophical issues;
2. consider the way texts exemplify the major concerns and formal features
that critics have associated with literary or film periods, movements,
and genres; further, the student will be aware of the ways that texts
change, depart from, or undermine the conventions of movements or periods
to which they belong;
3. in summary, be able, on request, to forge links between author or
filmmakers, their individual works, and various intellectual, social,
and aesthetic traditions, when applicable.
|